There are two different situations in which our employees are requested to discuss their activity, namely ancillary activities and third party activities. It is important to stress out the difference between these two since they are treated differently (see also Appendix 1):
1. Ancillary activities are defined as professional activities for third parties that are conducted by an employee of the university, though not in his/her capacity as an employee of the university, [...], in addition to his or her regular job at the university.
Note that not all activities performed in addition to an employee’s regular job at the university are ancillary activities. An activity that clearly has no relation with the employee's work for the university and that is obviously not detrimental to the interests of the university, in fact, is not considered as ancillary activity but as a private activity and does not have to be discussed or registered.
2. Third party activities are defined as activities for third parties that are job-related and carried out under the auspices of the university.
Note that third party activities means professional endeavours that are regulated by a contract and entail financial earnings.
In the scheme on page 3 of this document, we report an overview of the steps to be taken before performing ancillary activities and third party activities. In the paragraph below more information will be given.
Ancillary activities
Employees are supported to perform ancillary activities and will be facilitated by their first in line manager, provided that the ancillary activities are discussed beforehand with and approved by the first in line manager. After approval, ancillary activities need to be duly registered in the HRM portal. If the first in line manager is in some way involved in the ancillary activity, then the next in line manager should be involved in the discussion and approval as well.
Furthermore, the ancillary activity must always be openly disclosed in any situation that may require it, including, but not limited to, presentations at meetings and conferences, papers, and research grant proposals. The rationale behind this policy is straightforward: by definition, an ancillary activity may give an employee the opportunity to benefit privately from their position as a VU employee. External observers must be aware of this situation, as it could trigger (in good or bad faith) biased behaviours or impaired decisions.
It is important to stress that ancillary activities must be disclosed and registered by employees even if there is no financial (direct or indirect) compensation, because the lack of financial compensation does not necessarily imply a lack of interest. In case there is financial compensation or deterred financial income and/or interest for the ancillary activities, a second, additional meeting to discuss this is required with the Director of Impact (scientific staff) or the Director of Operations (support staff). The employee is at all times responsible to initiate these meetings and to disclose all relevant information. It is further important to realise that ancillary activities are supposed to be carried out on top and not instead of the VU contract hours, and should thus be monitored and discussed to avoid working schedule conflicts and to mitigate the risk of excessive workload.
It is important to note that each case is unique and needs to be handled with care and respect. The size of the employee's appointment is irrelevant, meaning that although an employee has a small appointment at the VU, their ancillary activities must also be discussed and approved. It could be the case that a first in line manager needs advice under which conditions approval can be given, has doubts about approval of an ancillary activity, or has second thoughts after approval. If that happens, the first in line manager and the employee can reach out to the Director of Impact or director of Operations, who will contact HR as soon as possible to discuss the case. If a first in line manager decides to refuse the performance of an ancillary activity, then this decision will be well substantiated and based on clear arguments. Moreover, when an employee refuses to give permission to publish ancillary activities, the Director of Impact will be contacted to discuss the matter. Under exceptional and well-supported circumstances, the director of Impact might agree with the employee in that the activity should not be published; in all other cases, the employee will be denied to undertake the ancillary activity until the latter is properly disclosed. Again, the employee is responsible to disclose any relevant information and follow the appropriate steps to ensure full transparency.
Third party activities
Professional activities carried out for third parties under the auspices of the VU and regulated by a contract should always be discussed with and approved by the first in line manager. If the first in line manager is in some way involved in the third party activity, then the next in line manager should be involved in the discussion and approval as well. These activities take place during the VU working time, and, generally, any revenues associated with these activities are for the benefit of the university. Registration of third party activities is not mandatory, but in case the activity is regulated by a contract, the contract must be approved by the department head and has to be signed by the Director of Operations.
To give consent, the first in line manager should consider the questions as posed in Appendix 3.
When to discuss your activity?
As a final remark, we would like to provide a (non-complete) list of questions that could help the first in line managers to approve the activity and our employees establish whether they should discuss their activities with their first in line manager or not.
To give consent, the first in line manager should monitor whether these activities:
- can be carried out without increasing the overall workload to uncomfortable levels;
- pose a risk to the academic, organisational and/or business interests of the university;
- constitute an obstacle to the effective and the complete performance of the employee in question's duties at the university (VU-first principle);
- may be detrimental to the reputation of the institution;
- presents (the appearance of) a conflict of interests with the university duties of the employee in question;
- uses IP, which belongs to the VU and/or which is gained within VU projects.
As a rule of thumb, if an employee would answer to at least one of the questions below with “yes”, they should check the activity with the first in line manager:
- Are there any similarities between the side work and the work you do at the university?
- Do you use the same network (persons/companies agencies) that you use at work by virtue of your position?
- Did you receive the (ancillary) work because of your position at the university?
- Do you make use of information, knowledge, facilities, or skills from your position at the university?
- Does the organisation or person for which you are doing the side work have a dubious reputation or might there be any geopolitical or security considerations?
- Do you want to do the work within your VU time?
- Will you receive earnings for the work you would perform?
As a side note, it is important to stress that, when it comes to professional relations with third parties, there are other, less evident situations that might need attention. For instance, an employee may have an indirect conflict of interest situation when, for example, a relative or a friend of theirs performs activities that may benefit or interfere with the role that the employee has at the VU. We urge all our employees to openly discuss any doubtful situation with their first in line manager or with either the Director of Impact (scientific staff) or Director of Operations (support staff).
Clearly, this document cannot cover all the cases we expect to emerge in the future. There will certainly be situations where the employee and/or the first in line manager will have doubts on how to interpret these guidelines. The Director of Impact or the Director of Operations is always available to look into any case that may need a deeper analysis, which, if needed, can be carried out with the support of HR, IXA and/or UB.