Involving students in improving education often starts with asking the right questions. But for meaningful student engagement, we need to look beyond end-of-course evaluations.
In the spirit of Students as Partners, feedback isn't a final step — it's an ongoing dialogue. Students reflect on their own learning process and help shape how education is designed and delivered. That requires more space for input, earlier in the process — and careful attention to how that dialogue is structured.
1. Use class time to gather feedback
Collecting feedback doesn’t have to be complicated. Regular class time offers opportunities to actively involve students. One striking example: at the end of a course, a lecturer asks three questions — what was interesting, what worked well, and what could be improved? Students respond anonymously, for instance using post-its. Crucially, the lecturer discusses the responses with the group — not just to report back, but to show students that their input is taken seriously.
2. Create low-threshold moments
Student panels are a well-known way to collect input, but they become truly effective only when thoughtfully organized. For example, schedule conversations right after class so students don’t need to make a separate trip. Foster a relaxed atmosphere — provide food or involve a lecturer who isn’t directly tied to the course. It also helps to hold these sessions throughout the academic year so students can still see the impact of their feedback.
3. Encourage involvement from the start
A culture of co-creation starts early. When students are told during their very first week that their ideas are welcome, their sense of ownership begins to grow. Programmes that actively build in moments for student input — such as redesigning parts of a course or rethinking a teaching format — report more frequent and higher-quality contributions from students.
4. Strengthen student representation
Students in programme committees or faculty councils don’t always have a clear sense of their influence. New members may struggle to make their voices heard. A duo approach (two students per cohort), good onboarding, and examples of what previous student members have achieved can make all the difference. An open and respectful team culture within the committee also supports active engagement.
Anyone who truly wants to involve students must show what happens with their feedback. Follow-up is essential: when students see that their input makes a difference, they’re more likely to stay engaged.
